However, in individual cases, when religious or other factors are drawn attention to, it is an attempt to "justify" rapes on ground of social identity of victims. The former is suggestive of rapes being part of other communal atrocities the targeted communities are subject to.When criminals choose to decide on physical abuse, from molestation to gangrapes, do they really care about social identity of rosary bracelet Suppliers their victims? Now was Nirbhaya’s social identity verified prior to her being targeted? Whichever social group and/or class she belonged to probably mattered little to criminals involved in that heinous crime. So would pronouncing death penalty for those indulging in such crimes play a major part in checking these crimes? Think again.Here one needs to draw a clear-cut line on whether victims’ social identity plays any role in deciding criminals’ psychological approach towards their victims. Yes, within a few days of issuance of this ordinance, there have been reports of equally heinous rape-crimes, including that of an infant.Greater importance needs to be given to changing this mindset.What an audacity to try and "justify" rape by describing it as "religious". But there is a difference between a series of rapes taking place around the same time as well as place and individual women/girls/infants being targeted at different places. If they dread anything, it is the thought of being caught and pushed behind bars.

　　Human chain formed in Aligarh with people from different religions carries the same message. Nor can they be held as representative of Indians at the grassroots and/or common Indians. And this carries only one message, which hopefully is understood by right-winged elements that their communal missiles, at this stage, have backfired!The writer is a senior journalist.Interestingly, aggressive communalism remains primarily confined to elements trying to target minority groups and/or institutions. What is worth taking note of that in recent incidents, the communal missiles fired by them appear to have backfired. The same may be said about the support voiced for Muslims over namaz issue. Besides, it is not the first time that they have raised their voices against communal behaviour of extremists. This is marked by notable difference in nature of communal crises, which took place several decades ago and the ones taking place now.

　　And if the concerned authorities have any objections, they should allot places and/or construct mosques for them to read their namaz. They do not represent a notable percentage of the population. Of perhaps greater significance is the fact that their criticism has not been ignored by communication, including the media, at practically all levels. Most people are not oblivious of political game being played by right-winged elements.Communal designs, of late, appear to have failed in emotionally arousing people in general. Also, as mentioned, some have viewed namaz issue and the recent communal incidents as a political design to deliberately spread communal tension.Undeniably, many Indian elites, including Muslims and non-Muslims, have strongly opposed objections voiced about Muslims reading namaz in public places. She has come out with two books Ayodhya Without the Communal Stamp and Image and Substance: Modi’s First Year in Office.