Parasaran said this right of State applies only to social reform, it still does not apply to matters of religion under by Article 26 (b).He said the concept is the presence of women in the age of 10 and 50 will disturb the penance of the Lord Ayyappa and hence the Lord himself does not want their presence. Arguments will continue on Thursday..He submitted that if the court were to abolish the practice, the very character of the religious institution will be irreparably altered which affects the rights of devotees under Article 25(1).Parasaran said not only the perception of the worshipper but also what is being worshipped is also important.He submitted that the present case does not involve a social issue but a religious issue.Referring to the observation made by Justice Chandrachud on Tuesday and the ban of women is due to the patriarchal system, Parasaran submitted that 96 per cent of the women in Kerala are educated and it is a matrilineal society. Devotees who visit the temple too are expected to observe celibacy in letter and spirit. When the CJI asked the counsel as to why women are excluded, counsel said it was being done as per the religious practice and custom followed for years. It does not therefore apply to religious aspects or right of entry based on genderHe said that even if Article 25(2) applies to women, it is rosary bracelet Suppliers only with respect to social issues but not religious issues.

　　When Justice Nariman pointed out that the notification restricting the entry of women of a particular age will violate the fundamental rights, Parasaran points out that the said provision requires the Tavancore Board to observe and maintain the practices of Temples under its administration.Parasaran submitted that Article 25(2) deals only with secular aspects and right of entry of classes or sections.New Delhi: As per the custom and long tradition, women in the age group of 10 to 50 are not allowed as manifestation of God in the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala is a celibate and the deity does not want the presence of women in this age group, argued senior advocate K Parasaran in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. But as per the custom and long tradition, women in the age of 10 to 50 are not allowed, as manifestation of God in this temple is a celibate.Parasaran made this submission before a Constitution Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Kanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra hearing a batch of petitions challenging the ban on entry of women in the age group of 10 to 50 in this temple.

　　He said that Shiva is no Brahmachari, but even when his meditative state was sought to be disturbed by Kama Deva, he was reduced to ash because he failed to respect that state of Shiva. By using 25(2), "your Lordship will reform a religion out of its identity" he cautioned the court.Parasaran, appearing for Nair Society, one of the intervenors, said Sabarimala was a unique temple where other than Hindus, Christians, Muslims and even foreigners are allowed entry.Parasaran said that Lord Ayyappas character as a Naishtika Brahmachari is protected by the Constitution and judiciary can’t interfere with it. If a devotee feels that he is not worshipping the idol of a Brahmachari, he may not go to that temple. He further submitted that Article 25(2)(b) is at best an enabling provision for the Legislature, it doesnt enable the judiciary to interfere with custom, which is an integral religious practice.In all other Ayyappa temples in Kerala women are allowed entry without any discrimination.Parasaran submitted that the basis of the practice is the celibate nature of the Deity, not misogyny.

　　"Your Lordships have to find a way to uphold this custom so that other similar customs are not disturbed.He said there is no connection whatsoever to the impurity of menstruation forming the basis of the religious practice.Young lawyer Sai Deepak appearing for People of Dharma argued that the public character of an institution does not take away the identity of the institution. That is against the concept of constitutional justness. Greatest caution is necessary when one seeks to produce equality since a single error can overturn the social order, he said."The CJI said, "one can have rights to regulate rituals, but you cannot impose discriminatory conditions. It has to be viewed along with other customs associated with Sabarimala temple.Earlier the CJI told the counsel "if you say it is a public temple, then the custom and essential and practice must be integral to the religion; the question is how far the practice of exclusion of a certain category of women is valid.The impugned practice gets constitutional protection through the freedom of conscience. That life is kept alive by the preserving the unique character of the Deity.New Delhi: The Kshetra Samrakshana Samiti on Thursday urged the Supreme Court not to tinker with the age-old custom and religious practice and said allowing women in the age group of 10 to 50 to enter the Ayyappa temple "will lead to social tensions in Kerala.Giri argued that only those who have faith in the practices and rituals of the temple deity could claim the right to worship under Article 25(1) of the Constitution.